2.02.2009

thoughts on the minimalist and "vegan until six"

I've been a fan of food writer Mark Bittman for a long time. These days he's getting a lot of publicity for a new book and the eating plan he's promoting, but my interest in Bittman goes way back.

Bittman writes a great column in the New York Times called "The Minimalist". He combines a few fresh ingredients to make simple, wonderful food. From The Minimalist, I learned the principles of making a good marinade, and once you do that you will never use the bottled goo again. (For convenience, we do buy two bottled brands of marinade, but both are expensive and hard to find. Most bottled marinades are mostly sugar, salt and chemicals.)

Bittman's column taught me how make fresh salad dressing, how to make delicious cold summer soups, how to roast a chicken, and a whole bunch of other useful cooking lessons. I have a slew of his columns photocopied in a binder. In fact, writing this reminds me of something I lost when I gave up my addiction to the Sunday New York Times Magazine. I think I'll pick up a copy of one of his books that's a collection of columns.

I don't want to give the impression I'm an avid and accomplished cook. I'm not. I go in and out of cooking in phases, and am just coming out of a prolonged period of not cooking at all, except marinating and grilling every day weather permits.

We always eat healthfully at home, but when I'm in a no-cook phase, dinner involves minimal effort and a lot of repetition. Now I'm getting back into it again, making soups and stews (I'm big on one-pot meals), and in general thinking of new ways to serve the organic beef, lamb and chicken that crowds my freezer. (My most recent post about that change is here, with links to older posts.)

I'm also trying something new: cooking in the morning, when I have time and energy, instead of at dinner time when I'm already tired and hungry. Added to my preference for cooking in large batches, this is a good way to cook several meals at once. I've set the modest goal of doing this every-other week, and so far it's working out pretty well.

Back to Mark Bittman. He has a new book out called Food Matters - A Guide To Conscious Eating. I haven't read it, I've only read about it. All the stories about it say the same thing, so it's safe to say they all come from the publisher's press release, and hopefully that accurately represents the book.

The expression "conscious eating" means different things to different people. For some people - like the websites here and here - it's about liberating themselves from a life of fad diets and learning simple principles of how to eat healthfully.

For other people, it's about knowing where our food comes from, and eating more locally-produced, minimally-processed food. For anyone who can afford it, this kind of conscious eating is an important step for your own health, for reducing animal cruelty, and for the health of the planet.

Mark Bittman has his own take on conscious eating. As I said, I haven't read the book. It may be chock full of great stuff that every single media outlet is omitting. But from the short version I'm seeing out there, I have some issues.

Bittman calls the basic eating plan "vegan until six".
With a colleague, Kerri Conan, Bittman devised a plan they called "vegan until six." They ate almost no animal products at all until dinnertime, no simple carbohydrates and no junk food. (Simple carbs are sugars, white flours and other processed grains like white rice.) At dinner, they ate as they had before, although in time Bittman found that even his evening meals came to include more "vegetables, fruits, legumes and whole grains and less meat, sugar, junk food, and overrefined carbohydrates." It was easy, and in a matter of months he'd lost 35 pounds, lowered his cholesterol and blood sugar, and had no trouble sleeping through the night. Most important, he continues to eat this way and is content to do so for the rest of his life.

I have some problems with this.

One, the "do this until dinner, then eat whatever you want" strikes me as a gimmick, similar - if not identical - to many other gimmicky diets out there. For a lot of people, restricting eating for part of the day, then hitting the off-switch, won't encourage good food choices. It will encourage over-eating, even binging.

I think a more integrated approach, eating from the same principles all day, would be healthier. Eating as few simple carbohydrates as possible and no junk food is smart eating. You can do this all the time, and if you need an occasional break from it - if you're just craving a juicy burger on a white-bread roll - then have it, and return to conscious eating.

"Vegan until six" strikes me as an all-or-nothing approach, which is just what conventional dieting is all about, and a huge reason why it doesn't work. (I realize if you're vegan, it doesn't seem extreme to you, but for an omnivore, a vegan diet will be very restrictive.) If using daytime vs. dinner eating helps you eat more healthfully, there's nothing inherently wrong with it. But if you feel deprived all day and let yourself go at the dinner table every night, you're not going to achieve good health and balance.

Two, for Bittman to have lost that much weight and straighten out his blood levels on this plan probably means that (a) he was eating far too much of the wrong foods, so drastically reducing them makes a huge difference, and (b) he may never have dieted before, or not for years, even decades. If you are a "diet virgin," and you cut out white sugar and white flours (i.e. simple carbohydrates), you are almost guaranteed to lose weight. Once. After you gain it back - which is inevitable - you'll find that the same eating plan no longer has the same effect. Conscious eating shouldn't be about weight loss. It should be about health - and the two aren't necessarily the same thing.

My third issue comes from a quote from Bittman that's making the rounds. This is from the Globe and Mail, but I've seen it several places. It's undoubtedly in the press release, and Bittman is using it for every interview.
The three things people are most neurotic about are food, sex and sleep. Very few people, every time they want to have sex, go have sex. Almost no one goes to sleep every time they get tired. But people think 'I'm hungry' and they go get food right away.

This jumped out at me right away as both wrong and unhealthy.

First of all, are people really neurotic about sleep? I know that many people don't get enough sleep, and could benefit from having more and better sleep, but does it really consume their thoughts in an unhealthy way? I don't think most people are neurotic about sex, either. I have no evidence either way, but my observations don't give me the impression that most adults have an unhealthy relationship to sex.

But most importantly, if you are hungry, you should eat. Any good nutritionist will tell you that. Your food choices are important. Crunching on some vegetables or an apple is completely different than scarfing down a box of cookies. And we have to distinguish between hunger and boredom or stress. Learning how to identify real hunger instead of I-feel-like-eating or I'm-unhappy-so-I-eat is a big part of healthy eating. That's why it's called "conscious eating". But if you are actually hungry, you should eat.

If you're hungry, and you don't eat, two things happen.

One, your blood sugar drops. This makes you hungrier. For most people, it also leads to irritability, lack of concentration, headaches, shakiness - and a general inability to make good food choices. If you wait until you're very hungry to eat, the chance of your making healthy food choices decreases.

Two, your metabolism slows down. Your body thinks it's starving. Not knowing when its next meal is coming, it tries to hold on to every last calorie, so rather than using stored energy reserves, it saves them up. That's why chronic dieters stop losing weight, no matter what they do. Restricting intake slows metabolism.

There are a gazillion websites and books about dieting and weight loss, and many of them promote fasting as a magic bullet. My perspective comes from my former life as a chronic yo-yo dieter, my work with a great nutritionist who is a nationally recognized expert in weight loss and eating disorders in the US, and my own research and writing about eating disorders, both for a major US magazine and a book.

Conscious eating is partly about listening to our own bodies. Sleep when you need to, have sex when it's right, and when you're hungry, eat.

12 comments:

Sarah O. said...

Was it in The Beauty Myth where the language of dieting is compared to the language of Christianity? All sins and self-denial and atonement? Turning our relationship to food into one of restrictions, guilty indulgence and self-flagellation is terribly unhealthy, no matter how "healthy" we seem to be eating.

L-girl said...

Thanks, Sarah. Good book.

is terribly unhealthy, no matter how "healthy" we seem to be eating.

That's a very good way of putting it. Healthy eating is not only about what goes in our mouths - it's thinking about food and eating in healthy ways.

Mara Clarke said...

I love Mark Bittman (especially his 101 10 minute meals from a summer or two ago) but like you am distressed by this famine/feast idea. The funny thing is we all know what we need to do to maintain healthier bodies (exercise, less processed food, more balanced meals, smaller portions, etc etc) but a lot of people also want a "quick fix" and therefore will jump on to a bandwagon like this.

On a somewhat related note, I have a couple great, easy, one-pot recipes that you can make in big batches, taste better as leftovers, and freeze like a dream. Let me know if you want me to email them to you.

L-girl said...

Mara, I'm encouraged to hear that you had the same reaction!

I have a couple great, easy, one-pot recipes that you can make in big batches, taste better as leftovers, and freeze like a dream.

That's exactly my kind of cooking. One pot meals always taste better the next day. Sure, send them over - thanks!

L-girl said...

(especially his 101 10 minute meals from a summer or two ago)

That was brilliant. Imagine how many people must have printed that out. When my mother was visiting, she saw my print-out and said she had one too, as did all of her friends.

Dharma Seeker said...

I haven't read the book but I must say as a vegetarian (not vegan) I find it disheartening to see veganism referred to as "famine" and meat eating as "feasting". Substituting some plant-based meals for meat-based meals is very healthy for bodies and the planet. I think of my Dad who has some heart problems but would not make the switch to vegetarian/vegan. One meat based meal a day actually sounds like a pretty good compromise to me. I'd also like to add that my diet was never as varied and balanced when I was an omnivore as it is now that I'm vegetarian. Choosing to give up meat whether entirely or for a few meals requires people to step out of comfort zones and habits and experiment with new foods and combinations rather than sticking with meals you've become accustomed to. Just my two cents.

L-girl said...

Thanks, Dharma Seeker. As I said in the post, I knew vegans would find my characterization of "vegan until 6" extreme.

But this is not just vegan vs omnivore that is making Mara and I feel it's feast vs famine. It's an attitude of restriction vs. "eat anything you want". Vegetarian eating can be very healthy (it wasn't for me, but I know it can be), but forcing yourself into a restrictive mentality - then eating whatever you want - isn't a healthy way to approach daily eating.

L-girl said...

Choosing to give up meat whether entirely or for a few meals requires people to step out of comfort zones and habits and experiment with new foods and combinations rather than sticking with meals you've become accustomed to.

I absolutely agree. Many people could benefit from that.

That's one reason I refer to myself as an omnivore rather than a carnivore. I eat lots of meals that are not meat or animal based.

This isn't what I''m seeing in the press around Bitmann's book, although it might very well be in the actual book, I don't know.

Cid said...

My philosphy on food was summed up by Michael Pollan's "In Defense of Food". It is "Eat food, mostly plants, not too much."
How simple and sensible. To it I would only add, "eat local as often as possible."

L-girl said...

I love Michael Pollan's work, it's had a huge influence on me. (As you'll see if you click on "food issues" category of this blog.)

"Mostly plants" doesn't work well for me, but "lots of plants with animal-based protein thrown in" does.

chanel said...

I read the book, and I think if you had, you might not object as strongly.

Bittman's diet is "basically" vegan until six, but he says repeatedly that it is not strict. If he wants some butter on his toast, he has some, and sometimes he eats vegan for dinner because he wants to.

It is the most moderate and practical approach to eating healthily that I have ever read about.

Also, I think you are totally right to say that both a)he was eating a lot of the wrong foods before making these changes, and b)he had never dieted before. He says so himself in the book. I don't see why that is a problem though, he was in a place where a lot of people are today. They don't think about what they are eating, just that they are eating. Those people would probably have the same results if they made the changes

One last comment, I agree that hunger is there for a reason and that we should listen to our bodies and eat when we feel like it. But fasting can also be beneficial when done right. And sometimes people eat before they are hungry just because they are thirsty or emotionally craving food. I don't know that I am trying to disagree with either you or Bittman, just a few random thoughts for the hey of it.

Nice blog!

L-girl said...

Thanks for your perspective, Chanel, that's good to hear.

Also, I think you are totally right to say that both a)he was eating a lot of the wrong foods before making these changes, and b)he had never dieted before. He says so himself in the book. I don't see why that is a problem though

It's not. However, people who have dieted quite a bit and already regulate their diets will not see the kind of results Bittman did.

Many readers of his book will fall into that category, and may wonder why they failed to lose a lot of weight and get their blood levels correct. And once again they will be in the cycle of diet and failure that so many North Americans live with.

he was in a place where a lot of people are today. They don't think about what they are eating, just that they are eating.

I question how many of those people will read this book. I think the market for Bittman's book is more upscale, and probably already fairly diet conscious - but I could certainly be wrong about that. I hope it reaches a lot of non-conscious eaters.

And sometimes people eat before they are hungry just because they are thirsty or emotionally craving food.

Yes, as I say in this post - learning to distinguish actual hunger from boredom, habit, stress, and other factors is a bit part of healthy eating.

I don't agree about fasting, but I know there's a wide variety of opinion on that.

Thanks for stopping by!